Skip to content

Optimizer step in backward tutorial #2567

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

janeyx99
Copy link
Contributor

@janeyx99 janeyx99 commented Sep 22, 2023

Add tutorial introducing the memory saving technique of fusing optim into bwd.
I still have to add this to a toc file somewhere, but I am not quite sure this is a recipe vs tutorial. How bite-sized is this?

Description

Checklist

  • The issue that is being fixed is referred in the description (see above "Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER")
  • Only one issue is addressed in this pull request
  • Labels from the issue that this PR is fixing are added to this pull request
  • No unnecessary issues are included into this pull request.

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 22, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/tutorials/2567

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit a4c48cc with merge base 677c1b6 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@janeyx99 janeyx99 changed the title [WIP] Optimizer step in backward tutorial Optimizer step in backward tutorial Sep 23, 2023
@janeyx99 janeyx99 requested review from albanD and removed request for albanD September 23, 2023 05:20
@svekars
Copy link
Contributor

svekars commented Sep 25, 2023

Should we close this one, since we have #2568

@janeyx99
Copy link
Contributor Author

yes

@janeyx99 janeyx99 closed this Sep 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants